Whether you’re seeking guidance on personal growth or a deeper understanding of complex subjects, this podcast delivers thought-provoking content that leaves a lasting impact. Join the ever-growing community of listeners and immerse yourself in the enlightening conversations of the Jordan Peterson podcast to enhance your knowledge and enrich your life.

The discourse and criticism around the Jordan Peterson podcast revolve around his controversial viewpoints on various subjects, ranging from political issues to gender and identity, with supporters praising his insights while detractors raise concerns about his stances and the potential implications of his ideas.

Who is Jordan Peterson?

Born in Canada, Jordan Peterson is a psychologist, author, and professor whose name has gained worldwide recognition. He is widely known for his insightful perspectives on various psychological and philosophical topics, including self-improvement, meaning, and personal responsibility.

With a profound impact on the online community, Jordan Peterson’s influential lectures, interviews, podcast, and books have captivated millions of individuals seeking guidance and understanding in their lives. His unique blend of academic expertise and practical wisdom has earned him a dedicated following, making him a prominent figure in the realm of psychology and self-help. T

he Jordan B. Peterson Podcast delves into insightful discussions on psychology, philosophy, and self-improvement, captivating millions with its enriching content. If you’re looking for profound insights into personal growth and navigating life’s complexities, Jordan Peterson’s work is an invaluable resource worth exploring, however, critics point to the negative discourse that tends to polarize his audience.

In Jordan Peterson’s biblical lecture series, he delves into the intricate relationship between the psychology of religion and theology, offering a unique perspective as a clinical psychologist. With a focus on the American church today and the broader religious movement, Peterson explores the architecture of belief and the impact of dogma, falsehood, and chaos on shaping individual and collective worldviews.

Through his insightful analysis, he navigates the complex terrain of biblical narratives, challenging traditional interpretations and shedding light on profound truths that resonate with diverse audiences seeking a deeper understanding of spirituality and human nature.

Jordan Peterson earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from the University of Alberta in 1982. He then pursued further studies at McGill University, where he completed his Bachelor of Laws (LL.B) in 1985 and later obtained his Ph.D. in clinical psychology in 1991. He is a licensed psychologist and has had a successful career as a professor, teaching at various institutions, including Harvard University and the University of Toronto.

Jordan Peterson’s intellectual journey has been shaped by a diverse range of influences from various disciplines. Some of the significant influences on his thinking and work include:

1. Carl Jung: The Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung’s ideas on psychology and the collective unconscious have greatly impacted Jordan Peterson’s understanding of human behavior and archetypes.

2. Friedrich Nietzsche: The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s concepts of the will to power and the eternal recurrence have influenced Peterson’s discussions on morality and existentialism.

3. Fyodor Dostoevsky: The Russian author’s exploration of human nature, morality, and suffering in his novels resonates with Peterson’s analyses of psychological and philosophical themes.

4. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: The writings of the Russian novelist and historian, particularly his account of the Soviet labor camps, have influenced Peterson’s views on totalitarianism and the importance of truth.

5. Jean Piaget: The Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget’s work on cognitive development has influenced Peterson’s understanding of the development of moral reasoning in individuals.

6. Joseph Campbell: The American mythologist’s ideas on the hero’s journey and the universality of myths have inspired Peterson’s exploration of archetypes and narratives.

7. George Orwell: The British author’s critiques of totalitarianism and the importance of individual freedom have informed Peterson’s discussions on political and societal issues.

These are just a few of the many influences that have played a role in shaping Jordan Peterson’s perspectives and ideas. His multidisciplinary approach draws from various fields, making him a unique and influential thinker in contemporary discussions on psychology, philosophy, and social issues.

The 12 Best Jordan Peterson Podcast Episodes

Jordan Peterson’s podcast has gained widespread influence due to its depth and competence in exploring various subjects, offering a merit-based approach to understanding complex ideas. Drawing inspiration from influential figures like Bonhoeffer, Squanto, and Socrates, Peterson provides a transcendent perspective that goes beyond conventional thinking. His innovative insights serve as an antidote to conventional discourse, captivating colleagues and listeners alike as they find inspiration and transformative knowledge within his thought-provoking discussions.

Biblical Series; Episodes 116-128

In this 13 part series, Jordan Peterson embarked on a series of lectures in 2017, exploring the ancient Biblical stories of Genesis from a psychological standpoint. Despite not identifying as a traditional theist, Peterson argues that these stories are fundamental to Western society, its laws, and its well-being.

By interpreting the Bible narratives through a psychological and existential lens, Peterson extracts valuable lessons from each tale, delving into the significance of human nature, tradition, and the importance of meaningful stories. While the lectures are lengthy, the major takeaways include understanding the nature of life and being, the impact of lofty ambitions, the power of choosing positivity over bitterness, and the importance of finding meaning in life.

Peterson emphasizes the significance of love and purpose and their role in fostering a fulfilled existence and defense against the world’s challenges.

Autism, Academics, and Animals with Dr Temple Gradin; Episode 318

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson engages in a discussion with Temple Grandin, a Professor of Animal Science at Colorado State University, covering topics like visual and verbal thinking, categorization, animal welfare, targeted activism, and the value of hands-on learning opportunities.

Temple Grandin’s impressive career includes designing livestock handling facilities used globally and pioneering animal welfare auditing programs adopted by major corporations. As an acclaimed author, her books, such as “Thinking in Pictures,” “Livestock Handling and Transport,” and “The Autistic Brain,” have gained recognition, with some making it to the New York Times Bestseller List. In recognition of her contributions, Grandin was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame in 2017 and honored as a Colorado State Distinguished Professor in 2022.

Dream Analysis, AI, & Fairy Tales with Jonathan Pageau; Episode 364

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson engages in an insightful conversation with Jonathan Pageau, a renowned French-Canadian liturgical artist and icon carver. Together, they delve into the profound narratives present in classic fairy tales, the impact of woke culture on positive storytelling, the potential of AI to extract new insights from historical and biblical texts, and the criticism of postmodern cynicism.

They emphasize the crucial importance of preserving foundational storytelling and the exploration of symbolism across history and religion through Jonathan Pageau’s YouTube channel and online carving class, further enriching their meaningful exchange.

Enlightenment and the Righteous Mind with Steven Pinker and Jonathan Haidt; Episode 198

Dr. Peterson, Steven Pinker, and Jonathan Haidt come together for a thought-provoking discussion on truth, societal functioning, utopias, the significance of religion, and more. Steven Pinker, a renowned psychology professor at Harvard and accomplished American author, brings his insights from books like “Enlightenment Now” and “The Blank Slate,” while also contributing to reputable publications like The Guardian and The NY Times. Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at NYU Stern, shares his research on cross-cultural moral foundations, reflecting on his works such as “The Righteous Mind” and “The Coddling of the American Mind,” with his upcoming book, “Three Stories about Capitalism,” anticipated in 2022.

An Atheist in the Realm of Myth with Stephen Fry; Episode 169

In this episode of the Jordan B Peterson Podcast, Peterson is joined by the multi-talented Stephen Fry, a notable British actor, writer, comedian, journalist, and intellectual with a wide-ranging list of accomplishments. They engage in a captivating conversation encompassing drama, literature, politics, and delve into subjects like atheism, religion, rationalism, empiricism, myths, and stories. Additionally, our discussion touches on bartering with reality, Greek and Egyptian mythology, the presence of cruelty in the world, and the merits of constitutional monarchy versus a democratic republic, among many other intriguing topics.

From the Beginning to Now with Lawrence Krauss; Episode 182

In this episode of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Jordan is joined by Lawrence M. Krauss, an esteemed American-Canadian theoretical physicist and cosmologist known for his significant contributions to particle physics and cosmology research. Dr. Krauss has held positions at prestigious institutions such as Yale University, Case Western Reserve University, and Arizona State University. He is also the founder of ASU’s Origins Project, a non-profit organization that hosts public discussions on science, culture, and social matters. Alongside his scholarly work, Dr. Krauss has authored popular books like “The Physics of Star Trek” and “A Universe from Nothing,” which have garnered widespread attention.

Toxic Masculinity – A 12 Rules for Life Lecture; Episode 52

“12 Rules for Life” by Jordan Peterson offers a profound and practical guide to finding meaning and order in an increasingly chaotic world. Drawing from a combination of psychology, philosophy, and personal experiences, Peterson presents twelve life principles that aim to help readers confront challenges and transform their lives positively. Each rule, such as “Stand up straight with your shoulders back” and “Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not to who someone else is today,” is accompanied by engaging stories and insightful explanations, empowering individuals to take responsibility for their actions, embrace their potential, and find purpose in the face of adversity.

Nietzche, Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard (Existentialism); Episode 148

This lecture, the 11th in the 2017 series, explores the giants of existentialism—a philosophical and psychologically grounded perspective that contends (1) mental illness or distress is inherent in human existence, and (2) embracing responsibility through action is the fitting response to life’s challenges.

Exploring the Pareto Principle; Episode 200

In this episode, Peterson explores the Pareto Principle, introduced by Vilfredo Pareto, an economist born in 1848, which states that 80% of consequences result from 20% of the causes, indicating an uneven correlation between inputs and outputs. This principle serves as a general reminder of the imbalanced nature of relationships between inputs and outputs. Known by various names like the Pareto Rule, the 80/20 Rule, or the Matthew Principle, Peterson frequently employs this principle to highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of inequality, illustrating that there is no simple answer to this intricate issue.

Your Dark Side and Control Over Your Life with Robert Greene; Episode 237

In this episode, Robert Greene joins the discussion to explore human nature and the principles related to strategy, power, and seduction. The conversation delves into the motivations behind power, deceptive strategies, Robert’s diverse career journey before becoming an author, psychopathy, manipulation, agreeableness, and grappling with guilt over ambition. Additional topics covered include channeling one’s shadow and more. Robert Greene, renowned for his NY Times bestsellers like “The 48 Laws of Power” and “The Art of Seduction,” is hailed as an international expert on power strategies, attracting a wide following in the business world and Washington DC, along with admiration from individuals ranging from war historians to prominent musicians like Jay-Z, Drake, and 50 Cent.

Julian Assange: Free Speech Martyr? Featuring Stella Assange; Episode 293

In this discussion, Stella Assange and Dr. Jordan B. Peterson delve into the crucial topics of freedom of information, the impact of internet journalism, and the case of Julian Assange, who is considered a prominent political prisoner in the western world. Stella Assange, a lawyer with degrees in law, politics, refugee law, and public international law, passionately advocates for her husband’s freedom. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, and unofficial author of free speech, gained notoriety for publishing classified government documents, resulting in his unlawful imprisonment. Presently, Stella is at the forefront of the fight for Julian’s freedom and the broader cause of preserving information freedom.

You Probably Should Have Read The Bible | Franciscan University; Episode 251

Recorded on April 4, 2022, this episode features Jordan Peterson’s speech at the Franciscan University of Steubenville, where he shares his recent reflections on ethics, scripture, and the intricacies of perception. He prompts the audience to consider why we easily remember great stories but quickly forget bad ones, why Western culture took the form of a book rather than other alternatives, and whether the West can truly be characterized as a “phallogocentric” culture. Jordan proposes a radical claim—that many problems we perceive as navigational challenges are actually veiled ethical dilemmas—as he delves into the complexities of navigating the value structures we encounter in reality.

How Popular is The Jordan Peterson Podcast?

Jordan Peterson’s podcast popularity has seen an increase since his suspension from Twitter. Defended by his daughter, Mikhaila Peterson, she pointed out that he went from “#45 in Apple podcasts to #25 since Twitter banned him.” Despite the suspension impacting his Twitter following, Jordan Peterson’s podcast has remained successful, ranking at number 1 in the educational categories on Apple charts in both the U.S. and the U.K. The podcast’s steady position on Spotify, reaching its highest ever ranking of 44 among all podcasts listened to in the United States, further solidifies its enduring appeal. Despite the Twitter ban, Peterson continues to produce content and videos, including an article he wrote for The Guardian titled “Why Twitter is Insane.”

Best Jordan Peterson YouTube Videos & Lectures

• Biblical Series
• Africa is not Poor Because of Colonization
• Identity Politics and the Marxist Lie of White Privilege
• Talking to Muslims About Christ
• Maps of Meaning
• 12 Rules for Life Tour
• Who Dares Say He Believes in God?
• Carl Jung Series
• Existentialism: Nazi Germany and the USSR

Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan

Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan share a professional relationship as well as a personal friendship. They have appeared together on Joe Rogan’s popular podcast, “The Joe Rogan Experience,” multiple times. During these episodes, they engage in deep and wide-ranging conversations covering various subjects, including psychology, philosophy, political issues, and more. Their dynamic and engaging discussions have resonated with millions of listeners, leading to a strong bond between the two intellectual figures. Beyond the podcast appearances, they have expressed mutual respect for each other’s work and ideas, contributing to their close friendship. Their collaborations have significantly contributed to their individual popularity and have solidified their status as influential voices in their respective fields.

Related reading: Best Joe Rogan Podcast Episodes

The Jordan Peterson podcast stands as a compelling and influential platform, drawing millions of listeners with its insightful discussions on psychology, philosophy, and personal growth. Peterson’s unique blend of academic expertise and practical wisdom has captivated audiences worldwide, offering a refreshing perspective on a diverse range of topics. Through engaging conversations with prominent guests and his own thought-provoking insights, the podcast continues to serve as a valuable resource for those seeking guidance, understanding, and inspiration in their lives. With its enduring impact and ever-growing following, the Jordan Peterson podcast remains an essential destination for individuals on their journey of self-discovery and intellectual exploration.

The Mystique of Jordan B. Peterson

Dr. Jordan Peterson is, without question, a polarizing figure. Like so many thinkers, some of his ideas are really out there, while others contain pearls of wisdom that are practical and can be applied to life. So you take the good with the bad, and walk away with what you want.

After all, there’s a big difference between being exposed to an idea and adopting an idea. It’s more important than ever to be aware of ideas that we may not agree with, but should still understand. Cool the temperature down a little bit.

With Dr. Peterson being de-platformed from so many other mediums, the Jordan Peterson Podcast is not only one of the last ways to hear his ideas but, one of the more discreet ways. Nobody knows what’s playing on those earbuds while you’re on the subway. So expand your horizons… or get really angry. But know why you’re mad. It’s healthier that way.

The post The 12 Best Examples of the Jordan Peterson Podcast’s Mystique appeared first on Discover the Best Podcasts | Discover Pods.

Rogan, an accomplished stand-up comedian, former MMA fighter, and commentator, seems an unconventional choice for delving into the complexities of scientific discourse. Yet, this very diversity makes the “Joe Rogan Experience” a unique platform in the world of podcasts.

Rogan’s transition from the high-octane world of mixed martial arts to the often reflective and contemplative sphere of podcasting is as intriguing as it is unexpected and divisive. Whether you love or hate him, you’ve got an opinion on his impact.

His primary role as a comedian and commentator has equipped him with a conversational style that is at the same time, engaging and relatable. This style, coupled with a genuine curiosity for a wide range of subjects, allows Rogan to navigate complex scientific discussions easily (if not always accurately), making them accessible to a broad audience.

The “Joe Rogan Experience” is more than just a podcast; it’s a bridge between the scientific community and the general public, demystifying science in a way few other platforms have managed. He’s not a scientist by any stretch, but there’s no denying he’s bringing real scientists some genuine exposure to audiences they otherwise might not have a chance to connect with.

In this blog post, we will explore Rogan’s influence on bringing science into the mainstream through his podcast, highlighting his engaging interviews with guests like luminary astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson and examining the wider impact of this medium on public understanding of scientific matters.

Joe Rogan’s journey to becoming a podcasting titan is as unconventional as it is impressive. Known primarily as a stand-up comedian and a color commentator for the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), Rogan’s foray into podcasting wasn’t an obvious career move. However, since its inception in 2009, the “Joe Rogan Experience” has grown exponentially, becoming one of the most downloaded podcasts globally.

Joe Rogan’s Influence on Podcasting

Rogan’s influence in the podcasting world stems from his ability to blend humor, insight, and a wide array of interests into a format that appeals to a diverse audience. His relaxed, conversational style, devoid of the formal constraints typical of traditional media, invites listeners into what feels like an intimate discussion among friends. He seems at ease (whether authentic or not) with fellow comedians and the Joe Rogan science guests alike.

This approach has not only garnered a massive following but has also reshaped the landscape of podcasting with his absolutely massive deal with spotify.

A significant aspect of Rogan’s influence is his openness to exploring a variety of topics, including science. He does so as a long-form discussion without notes that allows the guests time to breathe and the discussion to flow naturally. It’s not something you’re going to see as a B-block guest on Colbert, for example. There isn’t the time.

Unlike typical science communication platforms, Rogan’s podcast doesn’t shy away from controversial or complex subjects. He’s caught a lot of grief for this… sometimes rightly so.

Why the Joe Rogan Science Podcast Guests Bring Out the Best of the Show

This willingness to dive into the depths of scientific discussion without losing the inherent curiosity and excitement that drives science itself has made his podcast a unique and important voice in the world of science communication.

Rogan’s insane audience reach means that his discussions on scientific topics have the potential to influence public opinion and understanding significantly. Or ruin it.

But by bringing esteemed scientists and thinkers to his show, he exposes his audience to scientific ideas and debates that might otherwise remain confined to academic circles. It does seem like a good-faith effort. Not the purist, but done in relatively good faith.

So, who is that helping? Well, you dear reader, of course.

The Best Joe Rogan Podcast Episodes on Science

Let’s get to the meat of the experience. Joe has, without question, brought some pseudo-science to the table along with those who really do their absolute best to follow the scientific process. But like every experiment science conducts, if you’re drawing a conclusion before you test your hypothesis, that’s a problem.

Nobody is perfect, and the cosmos is a mysterious place generally, but this round-up is sure to evolve. Keep checking back. Sign up for our email list to get updated on our latest curation efforts.

A Recurring Theme Among Joe Rogan Science Guests

One thing you’re going to notice in the Joe Rogan Experience world is that credible guests will appear multiple times. If someone is a complete crackpot, well, sometimes there are booking issues. Science is a long game, right? The universe is 14 billion years old? We think?

It’s, then, laudable that the Joe Rogan science guests making multiple appearances are not only experts in their fields but are solid communicators of their work. As such, I’m not going to mention each and every appearance a particular guest may have made. These are just the episodes that you should listen to first to broaden your horizons as a listener.

If I didn’t pick your favorite, we may circle back. Hit us up on… ugh… X (@Discover_Pods), to let us know what you think is a better Joe Rogan science podcast episode.

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson

Neil has been appearing on Joe Rogan’s show since way back in 2013. Right around the dawn of podcasting, he’s been appearing. You can scantly have a Joe Rogan science podcast without Neil. Of course you can… keep reading, but he’s a staple in science media in general.

What makes his appearances so memorable and some of the most worthwhile shows to listen to is his innate (and practiced) ability to break down physics and the wonders of the universe in a way most everyone can understand. He makes items on massive scales, like the solar system comprehensible to the average Joe. See what I did there?

Now, granted, in addition to being an extremely gifted scientist, Neil is also a tremendous science communicator, so when he’s doing this show, he’s in his “pop” science mode, which makes these episodes all the more accessible.

One of my favorite appearances is episode #1159. The discussion starts and orbits around the intrinsic value of learning and how to become more curious generally. When the world is changing faster than ever, fostering that curiosity is more important than ever. Learning ought not to end with school.

Not only do they discuss astrophysics, cosmology, and Neil’s show Star Talk, but they bring so many other shows that can introduce science in an entertaining manner to the masses. He’s our generation’s Carl Sagan… he does host Cosmos, after all.

He’s one of the guests who draws the best out of a conversation with Rogan and creates some of the best content as a result.

Medicinal Mushrooms with Paul Stamets

Episode #1035 introduces the listeners to mycologist Paul Stamets for a wide-ranging discussion about altering consciousness and fungus’s role in practical medicine.

Now, obviously, we’re not promoting illicit drug use, but with programs like Mind Bloom making strides into the world of mental health and states like California seriously working to legalize psychedelics, this conversation is more important and relevant than maybe it has ever been.

Rogan, himself, is not shy about his use of mind-altering substances to explore his own consciousness. He’ll even walk right up to the line of recommending the experience without really crossing it. This conversation was way back in 2017. A conversation ahead of its time, the acceptability of cutting-edge science versus what society is ready to accept, can take a while.

Gallileo, Gallileo… and so forth.

This past summer, Joe had Amanda Fielding on the show to discuss psychedelics as well. While not a purely science-based episode or a classically trained scientist herself, she has worked in the field for over 50 years. In addition, her Beckley Foundation has a scientific advisory committee that is dripping with credentials.

This is a good example of a subject where Rogan has drawn some backlash. However, it makes for some great entertainment and should pique some curiosity or interest.

Joe Rogan Podcast Episode #1233 – Brian Cox

From across the pond, this episode brings us a fascinating conversation with particle physicist Brian Cox from the University of Manchester.

This conversation will blow your mind. For a couple of obvious reasons. One, contemplating the infinite is positively fascinating, and two, Cox was able to mount a global tour selling thousands of tickets per engagement to talk about cosmology. To discuss the absolutely unfathomable complexities of the universe and how what we call reality came to be. Or possibly how it came to be.

I’m not sure how many of us were around 13 billion years ago to say exactly what happened with the Big Bang, but that we can discuss it in a popular manner with expertise and rigor is encouraging.

In college, I had a professor who mentioned that sitting in on university lectures was how his mother exposed them as children to new ideas. It was their primary form of entertainment during high school for budgetary reasons, and this discussion/tour reminded me of that professor. It’s just all around, very encouraging stuff.

I don’t want to spoil the conversation for you any more than I have, but spend a couple of hours, perhaps with mushrooms, and get a larger perspective on existence.

Episode #1958 – Andrew Huberman, PhD

Andrew Huberman has been mentioned on this site before. I first heard him on the James Altucher show during the pandemic, discussing his work at Stanford and the Huberman Lab. He also has a podcast of the same name that you should check out if you enjoy this discussion with Joe.

While a trained neuroscientist, Huberman’s main focus is on improving human health using science-based approaches. It’s pretty widely known America has a problem with our collective health, so this discussion is right up a fitness buff like Rogan’s alley.

Now, these guys come from wildly different backgrounds, but everyone likes food, and they both like nutrition. It’s a good example of Rogan’s ability to skillfully interview a guest by expressing genuine curiosity.

Episode #940 – Sam Harris & Dan Harris

Two Harris’ (Harrisey?) for the price of one with this episode of JRE. Like Andrew Huberman, Sam Harris has a PhD in neuroscience and a Bachelor’s degree in philosophy from Harvard University. He’s probably more well known for his book The End of Faith, but he does take a very methodical, logical approach to his philosophical work. Not unlike a mathematician. Which can draw some ire from his critics.

Affleck, looking at you here, bud.

Say what you will about Joe Rogan science podcast episodes, but he’s given science and scientific topics a new push. But he wasn’t the bomb in Phantoms. That’s all Ben.

Dan Harris, to whom Sam is not related, is a former anchor for ABC and is now working on his project, 10% Happier. They both have podcasts and have become media figures in their own right, which is why this discussion is particularly engaging.

Sam Harris has been on the Experience a few times, but putting all three of these guys in the same room was very interesting. If you are into Joe Rogan and haven’t listened to either Sam or Dan, you will need to add their shows to your queue.

Dan’s description of a panic attack and how utterly consuming they are was of particular interest, and Sam’s take from the scientific insight was welcome.

Start with this episode, and then check out some of Sam’s other appearances on the show. If you’re interested in starting your own podcast, and you certainly should be, Joe and Sam have a discussion about how the human brain, from a neuroscience perspective, changes how you might go about monetizing said podcast.

Practical science in action there in Episode #1241.

They also discuss presidential candidates, censorship, Snowden, and all sorts of other topics that aren’t exactly science but are spurred by curiosity. So, that’s still fun.

Episode #1428 – Brian Greene

Brian Greene is a genius. Full stop. The scope of his work is to explain the universe from beginning to end and everything in between. Quantum mechanics, supernova, entropy, Stephen Hawking, universal field theory, order and chaos… it’s all on the menu.

Existential questions abound around every corner, which really put life into perspective. The finitude of life and the knowledge of that mortality is what makes us special, according to Greene. How does that small slice of time stack up in the cosmos? Especially since “we” think all complex matter will decay into nothing.

Could simulation theory help our finite minds grasp these monumentally complex concepts?

This discussion will suck you in and get the brain juices flowing.

Controversies and Criticisms

Rogan is a controversial figure. He’s divisive. No doubt about that, though I’m not sure that’s always intentional. Just about everyone in the podcast community has an opinion, and a good deal of time is that Joe Rogan sucks.

This needs to be taken with a grain of salt, though. He gets into trouble when he strays outside his perceived lane and into subject matters where he’s not a subject matter expert. But at heart, he’s an entertainer. What else would we, should we, expect?

Joe Rogan’s approach to podcasting, while widely popular and influential, has not been without its controversies, particularly in the realm of science communication. Two notable issues that have sparked debate are the reaction of some in the science community to Spotify’s support of Rogan and accusations of spreading misinformation.

Spotify’s Support: A “Slap in the Face” to Some in the Science Community

When Spotify signed an exclusive deal with the “Joe Rogan Experience,” it was seen by many as a significant win for the streaming platform. However, this move wasn’t received positively by all. Like, at all.

Some figures in the science podcasting community, such as the hosts and creators of science-focused content, viewed Spotify’s support of Rogan as a ‘slap in the face.‘ This sentiment stems from Rogan’s occasional hosting of guests who have controversial or fringe views on scientific topics.

For a platform to endorse Rogan’s podcast, which sometimes strays from the mainstream scientific consensus, felt to some like a disregard for the rigorous standards typically upheld in scientific discourse. This criticism highlights the tension between the open, exploratory nature of podcast discussions and the precision and consensus sought in scientific communication.

But Spotify is a business. A business that just dropped a tremendous amount of money on Joe Rogan’s person. Again, what should we expect from Spotify and specifically Ek? They caught a good deal of grief from the censorship lobby when they culled some of his past shows from the catalog. Should we really expect stronger methods of scientific rigor to be used by someone who is objectively not a scientist?

He talks about the existence of aliens in the same breath as a keto diet. I’m exaggerating somewhat, but these discussions are often all over the place.

Accusations that Rogan was Indulging in the Spreading of Misinformation

Joe Rogan has also faced accusations of spreading misinformation, particularly in episodes where the discussion veers into highly controversial or complex scientific topics. In some instances, his platform has given voice to perspectives that challenge or contradict established scientific consensus without sufficient counterbalance or fact-checking.

These instances have raised concerns about the responsibility of influential media figures to ensure the accuracy of the information they disseminate, especially on topics like public health or climate change where misconceptions can have real-world consequences. This was of particular interest during the pandemic when Joe Rogan flirted or outright questioned the validity of COVID-19 vaccines.

Wendy Zukerman and Blythe Terrell of the Science Vs podcast specifically called out Spotify’s content moderation rules, in an open letter, which they saw as lacking when it came to the Rogan show specifically. In protest, they went so far as to stop producing new episodes of their show on the platform unless they were created specifically to combat misinformation. Literally, they would only create new Science Vs episodes to combat misinformation.

It’s important to recognize the distinction between a platform designed for open conversation, like Rogan’s podcast, and traditional scientific communication channels. While the former provides a space for a wide range of ideas and opinions, the latter is grounded in a rigorous process of peer review and validation.

This difference can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or the spread of unverified information among the public, particularly when complex scientific matters are simplified or discussed without the necessary context.

Weighing the Balance and Seeing the Value

In conclusion, while the “Joe Rogan Experience” has played a significant role in popularizing science and making it more accessible, these controversies underscore the need for critical thinking and further inquiry among listeners. They also highlight the ongoing debate about the role of new media in science communication and the balance between open discourse and maintaining scientific integrity.

Science is the best guess, even by the experts. There’s little doubt that the guests we’ve highlighted here are some of the best in their fields who are subject matter experts. In this format, they’re talking to a curious layman who shouldn’t be seen on par.

When Joe Rogan discusses scientific subjects like vaccines without those subject matter experts and medical professionals, the audience shouldn’t be expected to take that as truth from on high. Discussing the cosmos with Louis C.K. isn’t the same as discussing cosmology with a trained astrophysicist.

See where we’re going here? Does he spread some misinformation? Sure. But, the audience bears some responsibility, when they get called out for saying something ridiculous at a party they heard on Joe Rogan, to, maybe, change their mind and consider their source. Exposure is the critical role Joe Rogan plays here, not subject matter expertise.

The Evolution and Future of Science Podcasting: Comparisons and Predictions

The landscape of science podcasting is diverse, and we think that’s a good thing. “The Joe Rogan Experience” is just one prominent example among many. In a relatively new medium, podcasting is still trying to find its footing and will go through boom and bust cycles.

In comparing Rogan’s podcast episodes that feature science-centric guests with science-focused podcasts, we can glean insights into the evolution of this medium and speculate on its future trajectory.

Comparisons with Science Podcasts

Let’s make this clear upfront. The “Joe Rogan Experience” is not a “science podcast,” per se.

Rogan’s approach to discussing science is markedly different from more traditional science podcasts. Shows like “StarTalk” hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, or “The Infinite Monkey Cage” with Brian Cox, tend to follow a more structured format, often focusing exclusively on scientific content with experts in the field. These podcasts typically aim to educate their audience on scientific concepts, using a blend of humor and rigor to make complex topics digestible.

In contrast, “The Joe Rogan Experience,” with its long-form, conversational style, offers a broader, more eclectic mix of topics, including but not limited to science. This difference in style means that while other science podcasts usually delve deeper into specific scientific issues with a higher degree of precision, Rogan’s podcast offers accessibility and a more diverse range of perspectives, albeit sometimes at the cost of scientific accuracy. Especially when left to his own devices and without a subject matter expert in the room to reign in some of the more controversial claims.

Rogan is an entertainer, albeit a genuinely curious one, but entertainers will stray outside their lane from time to time. We have to accept that as listeners.

The Future of Science Podcasting

Looking ahead, the future of science podcasting appears to be moving towards a blend of entertainment and education, a trend that Joe Rogan has been instrumental in popularizing. The amount of scientific rigor vs entertainment on any given show is going to fall somewhere on a spectrum from completely dry and accurate to completely, and outlandishly, unbelievable.

Rogan’s show skews much further towards the latter, but not so much when he has his scientific subject matter experts in the studio.

As younger audiences increasingly turn to digital media for information and entertainment, the demand for content that is both engaging and informative is likely to grow. So meeting that audience where they’re at is critical in getting the scientific rigor out there.

This evolution suggests a future where science communication is not confined to academic circles or rigid formats but is part of the broader cultural conversation. Podcasts like Rogan’s might serve as gateways, introducing new audiences to scientific ideas, and potentially leading them to seek out more in-depth or traditional scientific content.

The challenge and opportunity for future science podcasting lie in balancing entertainment value with factual accuracy and depth of content. As this medium continues to evolve, it will be crucial for content creators to navigate these dynamics responsibly, ensuring that the pursuit of broader appeal does not compromise the integrity of scientific communication.

Conclusion: Joe Rogan’s Unique Role in Popularizing Science

As we reflect on the “Joe Rogan Experience” and its place in the landscape of science communication, it’s important to reiterate that Joe Rogan is not a scientist, nor is his podcast a traditional science podcast.

However, Rogan’s value to the scientific community should not be underestimated. His podcast serves as a unique and influential platform and introduces a vast audience to scientific ideas and subject matter experts they might not otherwise encounter. The show is a tool. A lens through which science can find a broader audience. Science loves lenses!

Rogan’s strength lies in his ability to entertain, engage in open-ended discussions, and bring a wide range of perspectives to the table. This approach, while not always perfectly (or remotely depending on the guest) aligned with scientific rigor, plays a vital role in exposing listeners to new concepts and sparking curiosity.

Through his conversations with scientists, thinkers, and experts, Rogan has managed to make science more accessible and relatable to a broader audience, particularly the younger generation.

It’s true that Rogan’s methods are not flawless. As an entertainer and a facilitator of discussion rather than a scientific educator, his approach to complex topics can sometimes lead to oversimplifications or misrepresentations. However, the value of his podcast in the context of science communication is its ability to open doors – to introduce scientific ideas to those who might not seek them out independently.

In essence, the “Joe Rogan Experience” underscores a crucial aspect of contemporary science communication: the need to engage with diverse audiences in ways that resonate with them. You have to meet people where they are or they tune out.

While traditional scientific discourse remains vital, platforms like Rogan’s play a complementary role, acting as a bridge between the scientific community and the general public. Scientists doing real science shouldn’t be conflated with what “The Joe Rogan Experience” is.

While Joe Rogan’s podcast may not fit the mold of a conventional science podcast, its contribution to popularizing science cannot be overlooked. By providing a space where science can be discussed in an approachable and engaging manner, Rogan has inadvertently become a significant player in bringing science to the masses. His podcast serves as a reminder of the power of media in shaping public understanding of science and the importance of making science accessible to all.

The post The 7 Best Joe Rogan Science Podcasts on Spotify appeared first on Discover the Best Podcasts | Discover Pods.

This was back in college, and as a Philosophy major I stumbled upon his book The End of Faith. I found it empowering that someone with a mere B.A. in philosophy (albeit from Harvard) could secure a book deal.

I also found it empowering that he didn’t shy away from controversial topics. After all, controversy is part of the essential Sam Harris. So it was with an open mind that I approached that book.

I would later read the rest of his library as it came out. Lying (which has particular importance at the moment vis a vis Sam Bankman-Fried), A Letter to a Christian Nation, Free Will, Waking Up (his treatise on the importance of meditation), Making Sense, and This Will Make You Smarter all found a place on my physical bookshelf.

Podcasts Sam Harris – Waking Up | Making Sense

Thus I was excited when I discovered his podcast during the pandemic. At the time it was called Waking Up, but later changed to Making Sense to avoid confusion with his meditation app of the same name.

We had a new baby and were on lockdown in a quiet neighborhood. So I did a lot of walking, pushing a stroller, with headphones in, listening with rapt attention to Sam’s show.

As in his books, he doesn’t stray from looking at bad ideas, or the human mind, with scientific and philosophical rigor. A large portion of his work has been devoted to looking forward to the human race’s future.

And the existential threats we pose to ourselves that are hiding in plain sight. So let us then dive into the best podcasts Sam Harris has created to date in my opinion.

You can let me know if I’m wrong on twitter… though Sam Harris won’t be there.

Psychedelics

Sam Harris has several shows that feature the benefits (and drawbacks) of using psychedelics. I’ve featured a couple of them right up front because it’s one of the more interesting discussions, and something that isn’t necessarily left or right.

It’s a discussion that deals with mental illness and thus, cuts across all swaths of society.

#306 — Psychedelics & Mortality

Why this Episode is Important: In short, we’ve been fed a lot of nonsense about the potential benefits of psychedelic medicine, and it’s worth hearing from someone who has actually put their scientific career on the line to study it.

Don’t do drugs. Just say no. These are mantras drilled into the heads of every Gen Xer and “Elder Millennial.” We know these statements because they were everywhere. In our schools, plastered on billboards, t-shirts, and stickers.

They even invaded our video games.

But as we grew up, we learned that wasn’t the whole truth. The generations before us grew up with mantras like “Turn on, Tune in, Drop out,” from psychedelic pioneers like Timothy Leary. Making sense of the conflicting, empirical information we saw, versus what we were told was difficult.

Now what if we add death into the mix. This is where episode 306 comes in.

Sam discusses psychedelics with Roland Griffiths, Ph.D. He’s one of the leading researchers on mood altering drugs, and how psilocybin can be used to create spiritual, transformative experiences in patients. They discuss his Stage 4 cancer diagnosis and the nature of consciousness itself.

It’s a fascinating discussion for anyone who has ever suffered from depression, PTSD, or other mental illnesses. And for those who think they were lied to by the Government. Because you were.

#242 – Psychedelics and the Self

Why This Episode is Important: We don’t really have an idea of the scope of what psychedelic treatment’s scale is. Do we need to drop out to get the benefits?

Another really interesting discussion on psychedelics with Dr. James Fadiman on how these treatments can be used to know thyself.

They discuss the practice of micro-dosing, the different types of psychedelics available (natural and synthetic), who shouldn’t take these substances, and ultimately how they can be used to expand consciousness.

They also discuss why one shouldn’t take these drugs by themselves as a guide drastically decreases the chances of having a “bad trip.”

Sam taking on the subject of psychedelics is an interesting one. There’s quite a bit of discussion on personal experience, so it shows a bit of vulnerability that you may not be expecting.

#304 — Why I Left Twitter

Why This Episode is Important: In 2023, Twitter is a revolving series of messes fueled by the hubris of it’s owner, Elon Musk. The introduction to this episode is a fantastic explanation of what this type of communication medium is doing to us as a society, and as individuals.

I love listening to Cal Newport. After Sam explains why he deleted his Twitter account. Spoilers – Twitter sucks and is making people worse. It’s full of fragmented, broken conversations, and is sewing American division.

Looking at you January 6th run up. So, it’s not as though that’s particularly shocking that someone who is devoted to the advancement of the species would try an delete a vice that is breaking the species.

If we look at the latest Congress’ oversight hearings on the “weaponization of the Federal government,” we can see how quickly media bias at the big social media companies took center stage.

So, while this part of the show is relatively short, the rest of the discussion with Cal Newport is superb and focuses further on the fragmentation of modern life. How our time management has taken a collective hit and what we can do about it moving forward.

If you’re concerned about how fragmented our tribes have become, then this is an episode you need to listen to.

#301 – The Politics of Unreality: Ukraine and Nuclear Risk

Why This Episode is Important: We are likely closer to a malignant nuclear detonation than we have been in decades.

Central and Eastern Europe have been having a bit of a moment over the past couple of years. Well, really, around a decade since Russia decided to exercise some expansionist escapades. How the global order is shifting is unknown, but we can see how Russia is trying to shift the unipolar world.

If you grew up in the 80s or before, as I did, the thought of nuclear conflict was a real source of anxiety. It’s hard to shake now, nearly 40 years later in my case.

That’s why this episode with Sam and historian Timothy Snyder was so interesting… and calming. They discuss what the real factors behind the war in Ukraine likely are, and what the risks of escalation could be.

More importantly, they discuss the real possibility of de-escalation.

#300 – A Tale of Cancellation

Why This Episode is Important: Maybe we could all use a bit thicker skin.

The term “Cancel Culture” is thrown around a lot, but in this episode, Sam Harris takes a novel, and clever shot across the bow of those who would silence artists, writers, and journalists.

He interviews filmmaker and former firefighter Meg Smaker about her film “The Unredacted (Jihad Rehab).”

Sam is no stranger to taking on, intellectually, jihadi movements. But he does so knowingly. A jihad doesn’t require violence and the discussion dances around the intellectual side of the movement.

They discuss the coordinated effort to silence Smaker’s film and have it pulled from film festivals. There’s a difference between a jihad to advance the course of Islam and a violent jihad. There’s a difference between cancelling those who deserve it, and capitulating to bullies.

That’s what this discussion is about.

#280 – The Future of Artificial Intelligence

Why This Episode is Important: GPT-3 is one of the most disruptive and exciting technologies of my professional life. And I’m saying that as a writer. It’s worth knowing what it can do and what it can’t do. It’s not SkyNet.

AI… artificial intelligence. Chat GPT. GPT-3.

The Making Sense podcast was ahead of the curve here. In this episode, Sam Harris sits down with Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, to discuss the ramifications and existential risks of AI.

As a writer, obviously, the recent hullabaloo about ChatGPT and its impacts on the job market has me paying close attention. I was paying attention to this episode when it first aired and I still think it’s worth a listen to those who think AI may be coming for your job.

#241 – Final Thoughts on Free Will

Why This Episode is Important: This wrap-up of the series of discussions of free will may keep you up at night. But maybe that is exactly what was supposed to happen.

We live in a democracy. We believe in meritocracy and that we’re responsible for our actions.

But… what if we’re not?

What if there is no mental model that matches up with free will? What if what is predetermined, and baked in is a lot stronger than we think? The writings of Spinoza fascinated me as a young undergrad because the implications are enormous!

Sam Harris has written extensively on the subject of free will and this episode presents his final argument, in audio format, on the subject. If you really haven’t given much thought to free will (because the default is we think we have it), then you must listen to this episode as well as the other related episodes linked here.

#239 – Yet Another Call from Ricky Gervais

Why This Episode is Important: It’s Ricky Gervais and these episodes set the tone of what Absolutely Mental would become.

A special episode indeed. The call in episodes with Ricky Gervais are simply fantastic and lead to their own spin off mini series podcast.

There’s not a tremendous amount to say about these calls with Ricky other than his wit is razor sharp, he’s quick, and hilarious. If you haven’t watched his television show “Afterlife,” you are doing yourself a disservice.

Sam Harris is not a comedian, and Ricky Gervais, not a philosopher. At least neither by trade, but it is brilliant to see what two generational minds do when put in a room together.

#205 – The Failure of Meritocracy

Why This Episode is Important: The concept of meritocracy ignores the fact that you have no control over the circumstances you were born into. What’s known as the veil of ignorance. So how does meritocracy survive in such an environment? Thus, what do we owe each other?

Meritocracy is the dream right? Work hard. Bootstraps. White picket fences. A gold watch. These are the things we dream about. Or dreamed about.

Sam Harris and Daniel Markovits about how the meritocracy system has come up short for younger generations and how boomers may have pulled the ladder up behind them.

Harris begins by asking Markovits if he sees meritocracy as a problem. Markovits agrees that it is a problem but notes that we don’t have another system to replace it with because no one has come up with a better model for distributing opportunities than meritocracy.

Is it corporate courage that has changed the way we work? Cutting jobs and making people bounce around? Is a universal basic income warranted? These are all important questions in a shrinking middle class, because wealth matters, and it is being concentrated like an orange.

#194 – The New Future of Work

Why This Episode is Important: How we work has been a fascinating point of contention throughout my professional life. Ever since reading ReWork by Jason Freid. This one will get you contemplating your own professional future. Maybe I’ll be a bee keeper.

Matt Mullenweg, the co-founder of WordPress (the most popular content management system in the world) and Automattic (the company behind WordPress), has a lot to say about the changing nature of work and how it’s organized.

In this episode of Sam Harris’s podcast, Mullenweg discusses how distributed work has evolved over time and what we can expect in the future. He talks about how knowledge workers are becoming more independent and working from home more often, and how this trend will continue as technology makes remote working easier, faster, and more efficient.

We all watched the implosion of WeWork and how shared spaces weren’t the answer. But with more companies demanding workers come back into the office, what does the future of work really look like?

#157 – What Does the Mueller Report Really Say?

Why This Episode is Important: Because every pundit up to and including the Attorney General and the President of the United States had a self-serving opinion on what this most important of reports said. But what did it really say?

The Mueller Report will likely go down in history as one of the most important documents that more or less said nothing actionable.

There was politics, intrigue, and downright lies that obscured what was really in the report. Both sides claimed enormous victories that left the rest of us wondering, what the the Hell this thing really said.

In this episode, Sam Harris sits down with Benjamin Wittes to talk about what was in that report. What it really, ultimately, said, and what it means for the future of the country.

Spoiler: It’s not good folks.

#140 — Burning Down the Fourth Estate

Why This Episode is Important: American’s fell out of love with partisan news more than a century ago. But it’s back and we aren’t exactly dealing with that well.

Voters have developed a distrust of news media, otherwise known as the fourth estate.

Matt Taibbi and Sam Harris discuss the polarization of American politics through the lens of media. Voters live in media bubbles where they aren’t exposed to opposing ideas in any useful way.

Harris then brought up the controversy over the killing of Jamal Kashoggi, which had recently been revealed by Turkish intelligence officials—the Saudis have been maintaining that he left their consulate alive and well on October 2nd. Both Harris and Taibbi expressed disgust at this cover-up.

Truly, it’s difficult to imagine a scenario where open societies exist without the fourth estate functioning on all cylinders, and this discussion really should open some eyes.

#130 – Universal Basic Income

Why This Episode is Important: There’s a theme building. If work is changing and AI is poised to displace white-collar jobs, what are we going to do as a society?

Andrew Yang is synonymous with UBI, or “Universal Basic Income.”

The rise of automation in the manufacturing industry is well known. It’s been happening for several years now and has been a source of concern for some time. But what about the rise of artificial intelligence and its impact on thought workers?

It’s no secret that AI is making inroads into all sorts of industries as it matures, from healthcare to financial services. And while many people are worried about the impact this will have on their jobs, they may not realize how profound this change will be.

So what can we expect to see in the next decade or so?

That’s what Sam Harris and Andrew Yang discuss in this episode where the tenants of UBI and corporate cowardice are discussed at length.

#116 — AI: Racing Toward the Brink

Why This Episode is Important: Human beings like to be the center of attention and we look at our creations through that lens. But what is AI actually going to do? Will it even care about us?

Moving beyond ChatGPT and other linguistic learning algorithms, this episode explores more of your SkyNet, Terminator type of AI.

Just because we can create something, ought we?

That’s one of the most troubling questions humanity hast to ask itself. Our yearning to push the brink of what we can do is strong. But we also know that we tend to screw up a lot.

Should we be constructing minds that are completely artificial. Minds that we may not be able to control. Should we try to control them in the first place? This is a wide ranging discussion of AI that avers towards making the listener think about the implications of unintended consequences.

Something we’ve shown a complete incompetence towards over the past hundred or so years. At least. At… least.

There are quite a few podcasts Sam Harris has done on AI, and the implications. Will AI even care about humanity, or will it think of us more like a trail of ants? Yeah, we don’t necessarily want to step on them, but we also don’t want them in our pantry.

Interesting topic.

#112 — The Intellectual Dark Web

Why This Episode is Important: It teaches us how to apologize and recognize that sometimes we make some bad associations.

At a certain point it was “cool” if you were a cisgendered white male to be part of the Dark Web… but the one for intellectuals. Not that 4 Chan Q Anon crap.

You got to play faux status games and explain what moral knowledge was to those less suspecting. Discuss mating strategies and the basic neuroscience behind dating.

Now, this is an older episode. Sam Harris has since disavowed any such membership in this shadowy web of intellectual sophists. That doesn’t make the interview/discussion with Eric Weinstein and Ben Shapiro not worth a listen.

If you can’t listen to something egregious and learn a lesson, that’s not great. It’s not even good. It’s not even fair.

We’re better off from learning from our mistakes, like giving old Ben Shapiro a platform. We’re better off for learning from his rhetorical nonsense. Is he a great guy? No. Can I learn something from him? Yes.

Open minds.

#111 — The Science of Meditation

Why This Episode is Important: Meditation is not religion. It has a scientific benefit. Something prayer hasn’t reproduced.

The benefits of meditation aren’t magical, they’re science.

Western science is beginning to come around to the benefits of meditation, which eastern schools of thought have been touting for literally thousands of years.

Studies have shown that meditation can help with everything from stress relief to pain management, and even make us more intelligent! In fact, there are so many studies showing these benefits that we could probably write an entire book about it. In fact, Sam Harris has.

In this episode Sam discusses the latest science on meditation with Daniel Goleman and Richard J. Davidson. It’s a phenomenal discussion and worth missing your subway station to make sure you get it all in.

Assuming you’re in New York City of course. If you’re not, use your public transportation metaphor of choice.

#89 — On Becoming a Better Person

Why This Episode is Important: You can only give your integrity away once. So it’s important to build character that doesn’t allow for that to happen.

What does it mean to be blameworthy? How about praiseworthy?

We throw around these terms, these labels, and don’t often explore what it means to attach them to a person, let alone a person’s actions.

In this episode Sam sits down with David Brooks to discuss his book The Road to Character. Character is something that has been sorely lacking in society of late, both in definition and in substance.

So it was especially enjoyable to have to bright thinkers discuss what it means to have character in an age where the term seems antiquated. Really one of the best podcasts Sam Harris has made.

#81 — Leaving Islam

Why This Episode is Important: It’s a primer on Sam’s larger work that launched his career. While he no longer spends much time on the subject of Islam, this is a great primer to his views..

The entirety of my adult life has orbited around a confused discussion of Islam.

From the war on terror, to Palestine it has been difficult to get a straight answer on the subject. To Harris’ credit, he has spent a great deal of time promoting atheism, albeit with a genuine curiosity towards the first principles of Islam.

Like Christianity, or Bitcoin, there are layers built upon the core code that have distorted what those core tenants are. Islam is no different in that regard.

This discussion with Sarah Haider is enlightening. Listening to it now, in 2023, when there are uprisings in Iran and the Taliban has taken back Afghanistan, it is more informative than ever.

#47 — The Frontiers of Political Correctness

Why This Episode is Important: There shouldn’t be topics that we can’t discuss. Especially the hard ones where people tend to have entrenched beliefs that are difficult to shake.

Are there certain subjects that are off limits? That cannot be discussed? As Dave Chapelle said, is there a stove too hot to touch?

This episode originally aired in 2016, but the underlying subject matter is more poignant than ever. We should be able to discuss “taboo” subjects without fear of cancellation. We should expect reprisal, but only rhetorically.

That’s what makes the public square great. That we can discuss the subjects that are slowing us down. That are holding us back. Sam’s discussion here hits on many of those difficult subjects.

Not for shock value, but for the benefit of public discourse.

#37 — Thinking in Public

Why This Episode is Important: It’s Neil deGrasse Tyson at his apogee on a podcast. Yes, he’s had good appearances on the Joe Rogan Experience, but this one is my favorite.

Neil deGrasse Tyson has shown us how the game is to be played.

He’s respected. He’s a genius. And he’s dumbing down subjects such that morons like my can understand them.

This talk between Sam and the aforementioned deGrasse Tyson goes on to show how public discourse should be handled. It should be heavy in subject matter, but lighthearted in execution.

Life isn’t that serious and not a single one of us makes it out alive.

#20 — Still Sleepwalking Toward Armageddon

Why This Episode is Important: It snaps us back to a reality where that “society is heading in the wrong direction” question has some real-life consequences.

When the terror attack in Paris happened, it shocked the world.

It was simple, precise, unexpected, and effective. In this episode, Sam reflects on the conflict between a pluralistic, liberal, open society, and an ideology bent on upending that.

And what can be done about it. Sobering to say the least.

#3 — WAKING UP: Chapter One

Why This Episode is Important: Sam has taken the science of meditation and made it his mission to make that science applicable to everyday life.

Spirituality without religion. That’s kind of Sam’s modus operandi.

This early episode of the podcast is the first chapter of his book, Waking Up. For those who are interested in mediation, and spirituality, but can’t stomach the dogma, this is a must listen.

#63 — Why Meditate?

Why This Episode is Important: A down to earth discussion about the benefits of meditation is beneficial to anyone. If you’ve ever been curious about meditation, this is the episode for you.

Jack Goldstein is a one of the finest vipassana meditation teachers in the west.

Originating roughly 2,500 years ago in India, vipassana meditation is one of the oldest continuously taught practices in existence. In this episode, Sam and Jack discuss the origins of the practice as well as the benefits to the individual this type of mediation offers.

What does it mean to be enlightened? Where does one derive ethics? These are the subjects covered in this wide ranging talk.

#62 — What is True?

Why This Episode is Important: We know a lot less than we think we do. That little bit of postulation can make us humbler and more accepting of other view points that conflict with our own.

One of the first things I learned as a philosophy undergrad was that over more than 2,000 years of western philosophy, there is no agreed upon definition of what is true. That’s the basis of epistemology.

Now, is Dr. Jordan Peterson an expert on what is true? Probably not. But that doesn’t make this discussion about a very murky subject any less interesting.

Take everything said here with a mountain of salt, but as a psychologist, Dr. Peterson is interesting. We’ll dive into his podcast in later posts, but it is an interesting discussion regardless.

#103 — American Fantasies

Why This Episode is Important: Belief and knowledge are like cousins who can’t agree on anything at Thanksgiving. American’s excel at this epistemic conflict.

American’s believe a lot of things. A lot of unfounded things. We hold ideas that have no basis in reality, and as a result, cost ourselves quite a bit of grief.

This discussion features host of Studio 360, Kurt Andersen, to discuss just how ripe Americans are for believing in things that there’s no objective reason to believe in.

Sam and Kurt discuss the puritan ideals that the country was founded on and how those ideals filtered down through history to create some really confounding movements. They discuss Trump, of course, but populism in general and why populism seems to have developed a strong mistrust in expertise as a concept.

It’s a really compelling argument for fixing some of the broken institutions we currently have and trying to redevelop some trust in those who know what they’re talking about.

#270 – What Have We Learned from the Pandemic?

Why This Episode is Important: For the past 3 years we have experienced a collective, global, trauma. But what, if anything, did we learn from the experience?

That Americans believe ideas they have no reason to believe. Basically.

America’s response to the pandemic was abysmal. There’s good reason that we’re still dealing with variants, long COVID, and the like in 2023. Our collective response was fragmented, broken, and not at all taken seriously.

We peddled conspiracy theories for political gain. In short, it was pretty ridiculous the country was shut down for so long. In this episode Sam and Nicholas Christakis discuss the response, where we failed (everywhere essentially) and how this is a primer for a more serious future matter.

#295 – Philosophy and the Good Life

Why This Episode is Important: Everyone needs more philosophy in their lives.

I was drawn to philosophy as an undergrad for a reason. I believe that the unexamined life is one that is full of angst and unnecessary regret. There really is something to philosophy being a gateway to the “good life.”

Or at least a nice life. Your best life. Not mine. The best version of your life possible. That’s why stoicism is having such a resurgence in the popular zeitgeist.

Kieran Setiya and Sam discuss how philosophy can influence our thinking and temper some of our more troubling thought patterns. Quell the FOMO if you will.

It’s a fantastic discussion and a perfect example why I think everyone should read more philosophy on a regular basis.

The Joe Rogan Experience

Why These Episodes Are Important: They show that Sam can bring his intellect out of his own environment and share it with most any audience. A real treat.

An honorable mention goes to the episodes Sam appears on JRE. Since Rogan is also a proponent of psychedelics, there are some interesting discussions on the topic.

I’m also a fan of the episode that features Sam Harris as well as Dan Harris. It showcases both of their phenomenal work introducing meditation to the layman. It is an episode that dovetails nicely with Kiernan Setiya’s episode on Making Sense.

Making Sense of it All

Sam Harris may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but I think that has more to do with his association with the dark web of so called intellectuals of which he really isn’t a part.

That’s pure sophistry. Lumping Sam Harris in with Ben Shappiro is universally a bad idea that helps nobody and isn’t a fair comparison.

Ideally these episodes will shine some light on why Sam Harris is a quality thinker and someone who can shake up your thinking somewhat.

The post 27 of the Best Podcasts Sam Harris Has Produced appeared first on Discover the Best Podcasts | Discover Pods.

Not quite as easy. But…

Can Podcast Interviewing Techniques Be Learned?

Yes, podcast interviewing techniques can be learned by studying the fundamentals, a little bit of psychology, and practicing, a lot. It may seem awkward at first, but it is in fact a fun skill that can translate into many facets of your life.

Learning how to interview people and create a great podcast takes time and practice. That’s why today, we’re going over the fundamentals of interviewing so you can make your podcasts even better than they already are.

One of the best interview podcasts 2022 had to offer was Hot Ones with Sean Evans. He’s an amazing interviewer and has some of the best podcast interviews with celebrities on the internet. We’re going to look at his example several times throughout this article.

A Great Podcast Interview Is Well Researched

The more you know about your subject, the easier it will be for them to open up about themselves and their work. You’ll also be able to ask them questions that make them feel like they’re talking about something they love—which means they’ll feel more comfortable and be able to relax. Honestly, they’re going to feel engaged and that they’re being heard.

This will make for a better interview overall!

Have a Podcast Interview Checklist

Even short interview podcasts need a checklist. Especially if the subject matter isn’t in your wheelhouse. You don’t need to be a subject matter expert, and in fact, it’s better to know a little less than you’d like.

Be Curious

Know the material you want to cover ahead of time, and make sure you can weave that information into your podcast interview questions. Without forcing it.

You can do this by reading through their past interviews, looking at their social media posts, or even just Googling them. Once you have a good sense of who they are and what they stand for, it’ll be much easier for you to craft your questions in a way that makes sense to both parties.

Craft Meaningful Questions for You and Your Audience

You also need to make sure that your questions feel like they matter. That you care about them. That you know your audience and that your audience is going to care about the answer to your question. That you understand podcast interviewing.

Even if you don’t yet have podcast interviewing completely figured out, you just keep

If they don’t seem like they matter at all—either because they’re too boring or because they’re too hard—you might find yourself looking at a blank face instead of an engaging subject.

Make sure that whatever question you’re asking is interesting enough so that it doesn’t feel like an afterthought on either side of the table. That means you need to go deeper than whatever it is they’re there to talk about. You have to go deeper.

A Killer Interviewer Remembers Why They’re There

And that’s to ask great questions.

Be aware of the power dynamic in your conversation; don’t let yourself get too comfortable during an interview, and let down your guard because you think it will make for a more relaxed conversation! Remember: You’re still in charge here.

You’re driving the bus, and if you get star-struck and lose control, the whole thing can seem like a bit of a farce, boring, or otherwise just confusing.

This interview by Peter McCormack on What Bitcoin Did was one where he lost control, and it went a bit off the rails.

You don’t have to love or hate bitcoin (if you are interested in learning more about bitcoin the CryptoTab Browser is Chrome based and will earn you a bit in the background) to realize that.

This is a show I love, and he was the first to admit that it didn’t come out as he wanted. It happens to professionals, so remember, always be learning.

Ask open-ended questions

When you ask someone to name their favorite color, it’s not an interesting question because there is only one answer (and they probably already know what it is). But if you ask them how they feel about their favorite color, why they chose it, or what color means to them personally—that’s when things get interesting. Podcast interviewing is all about when things get interesting.

This kind of question doesn’t have an easy answer, so your guest will be forced to think more deeply and share more personal information with you and your listeners.

In the same vein…

Don’t ask leading questions!

Leading questions seem like they’re trying to guide your guest into saying what you want them to say. For example, instead of asking, “Do you think [something controversial]?” try asking, “How do you feel about [something controversial]?”

The latter gives your guest more freedom to let loose and divulge something nobody else may know.

Podcast Interviewing is About Letting Them Talk.

Don’t interrupt them while they’re trying to answer a question—let them finish their thought before jumping in with another question or comment of yours; this will make for a smoother podcast episode overall since it will be uninterrupted by any dead air time between responses from either party involved (you as host/interviewer vs guest/interviewee).

Use “why” as part of your questioning technique when asking questions. For example, you could start a question with “Why do you think that?” or “What makes you say that?” This will help your guest feel like they have more control over their responses and gives them a chance to elaborate on their answer before moving on to another question.

Use Active Listening

What this means is a creative podcast experience is going to make heavy use of active listening. You’re going to notice that in almost all great podcast interviews.

Ask about their experiences, not just their opinions. This is especially important if you’re interviewing someone who works in a specific field, like healthcare or law.

It’s easy for them to give you their opinion on a topic, but asking about their experiences, what helped form those opinions, will help paint a more accurate picture of what it’s actually like being in that line of work.

Master Active Listening with Udemy

Watch the Podcast Interviewing Master Work

Take a look at Sean interviewing Matt Damon about why there aren’t so many indie movies getting made with big names.

Matt’s conjecture is that the fact nobody buys DVDs anymore means that filmmakers can’t count on that second major source of revenue. And as someone who worked at Blockbuster for several years before they went under, I tend to agree. That DVD (or even VHS) cash source meant a huge box office smash wasn’t necessarily the only determining factor.

It’s pretty obvious Damon didn’t expect that question and had to give it some thought. It also appeared as if he genuinely enjoyed the experience.

You can also ask them how they came up with those opinions since most people have had some sort of experience that led them down the path they’re currently on. Or maybe they’ve never really thought about it. Either way, getting the guest to think is important.

Keep Your Questions As Simple As You Can

Don’t ask questions that require a lot of background knowledge on the subject matter—keep it simple. If the guest gets a little too in the weeds, a little too wonky, get them to break down, in a creative, relatable way, what they’re trying to say.

Fire off analogies at will. And make sure to respond to your guest in your own words, clarifying what they just said. First, it helps your audience understand what’s being said, and nobody feels taken out of context the next day. It’s what Socrates would do.

Be aware of the power dynamic in your conversation; don’t let yourself get too comfortable during an interview, and let down your guard because you think it will make for a more relaxed conversation! Casual but professional is what you are looking for to get solid answers. How?

Keep on reading.

Remember: You’re still in charge here, so keep your hands on the conversational reins.

Make Eye Contact

This is how to interview someone for a podcast remotely. And it’s something even some of the bests got wrong during the pandemic.

It helps people feel heard and understood, so they’ll be more likely to open up about what really matters to them! It instantly builds charisma. Keeping eye contact is a huge part of active listening.

Pro tip – to keep eye contact remotely, you will look directly into your camera lens. Even if your show is audio only, having a video recording makes for better podcast interviewing.

Practice makes perfect here because it will feel awkward if you’ve never tried it before. The natural instinct is to look the subject in the eyes on the screen, but of course, that’s not where the lens is.

If you’ve never tried it, give it a go by filming yourself or on a call with a friend.

Keep it Casual.

Our friends at hot ones are casual but always professional. Sean’s interview with Dave Grohl of Foo Fighters is stellar.

I have to think they were a few sheets to the wind at the end of the interview, but it was never sloppy.

Casual conversations that don’t require anyone in the conversation to be a subject matter expert encourage the listener to hang in there with you. Even if they don’t fully understand what’s going on.

Skip the Obvious Questions.

If someone is doing a book tour or promoting some product, try to leave as much of that at the door as possible when crafting your questions.

Remember, they’ve probably heard it all before, and it makes for a dull experience. For everyone involved.

If you’ve ever seen a movie press junket go off the rails with the interviewer getting played for a fool, that’s usually why. They’re asking a question that’s been answered a thousand times that day alone.

It makes you, as the interviewer, look like a moron because your subject knows their material back to front. You have to bring something new to the table.

Watch this professional interviewer savaged by Robert Downey Junior for his, let’s call them, lackluster podcast interviewing skills. Well, interviewing skills generally.

Again, our boy Sean Evans will get podcast guests to openly remark about how deep a dive he did or what a good question that is. He only has so many hot wings, so he never burns a sauce (pun intended) on some obvious question nobody will care about.

Conclusion

We hope that these tips have helped you to learn about the best way to interview someone for your podcast. We throw a lot of attention Joe Rogan’s way on this site, and he’s a great interviewer as well, but for my money, it’s Sean Evans who comes out on top.

Watch and listen to how he improves the conversations season after season. He is learning to implement these skills to create compelling content with just about every guest he has on.

If you follow them, we’re sure that your listeners will be impressed by how much more engaging and informative your episodes are! If you want to learn more about active listening and how to get it done quickly, check out this excellent course on Udemy by clicking the link below.

Learn Active Listening Skills Today

Improve Your Active Listening Skills Today

The post 9 Podcast Interviewing Fundamentals To Make Your Podcast Awesome appeared first on Discover the Best Podcasts | Discover Pods.